Maybe it wants to mate with her.  Who knows?  It sucks waiting until February to find out though.

New poster and a french trailer with some new scenes in it:

http://werewolf-news.com/2009/11/zut-fr … nd-poster/

And here's a little wolfman featurette with a bit of awesome behind the scenes footage:

http://www.shocktillyoudrop.com/news/to … p?id=12900

No matter what the movie is like, the new posters are rockin'!

http://www.bloody-disgusting.com/news/18210

Reminder of the official website, as I see it's been updated:
www.thewolfmanmovie.com

The new release date for the movie is February 12, 2010.

Awesome costume... check it out

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cn0F91qGeAQ

Those posters = kickass, of course! 'specially the middle one/bottom one!

Daninsky wrote:

Well, well, not sure what to think about that new trailer. This doesn't look like much of a horror movie anymore, just a slightly darker version of Van Helsing.
Pity that, the preview picks looked pretty decent back when.

Love the poster-art.

That's kind of a good thing. Van Helsing needed to be darker(among other things) to be better.

Also, Wolfman already has a leg up on Van Helsing by casting great actors and not having a CG Wolfman.

So it's already automatically better than Van Helsing.

Via UniversalPicture's Twitter:

UniversalPics
 
... this just in: THE WOLFMAN has been rated 'R' for bloody horror, violence and gore. Get ready: February 12, 2010

Read some encouraging news online about the movie, courtesy of Shock Till You Drop and Total Film Magazine:

Total Film Magazine has producer Scott Stuber on the extra work that was done by director Joe Johnston.

Here's an excerpt from their article:

Scott Stuber explained the movie's metamorphosis. He said: "The visual effects work was so complex that some of the stuff wasn't ready. There were so many textures we had to create, like landscapes of London and all the elements within the London sequence; they just weren't where they needed to be."

Asked about talk that the design of the werewolf had proved a digital effects nightmare, he said: "It was never our attention for this to be a CGI-fest. Our whole thing was to honour Lon Chaney Jr and the spirit of the original.

"It's an authentic, make-up-driven film, but there are transitional pieces that we needed to do in CG, so you didn't have to cut away during the change in the monster. Integrating the make-up and the effects to make them feel like one cohesive whole was always going to be a challenge and it's something we've had to work through."

He said director Joe Johnston had done "an excellent job" but the first test screening led to a need for reshoots: "We needed one more piece between Benicio (Del Toro) and Emily (Blunt). We added a new scene during the post-bite, pre-transformation sequence when he's starting to realise something's wrong."

They also beefed up the action in the London set-piece, which piled more work on the special effects team.

A second test screening had 'terrific results' and Stuber is optimistic: "It's a big quality piece of entertainment. It's beautiful, rich, gothic, tragic - it's everything you hope it would be."

looks vicious!
awesome.

Aah crap. I'm going to have to drag my dad along with me for this one, then . . .

Look at that big-ass head! He looks like a mascot! hahahahaha