The werewolves in the first were designed to look more feline. The artist thought it would make them more "sexy". I think it made them look like they lost a battle with a Combine. Where's the fur? I only saw a few tufts on the tops of their heads. 2 was definitely better on the wolf aspect, but they seemed a lot less animated.
Offline
Here's the website of the person who played "William" in that movie: www.creatureboy.com
Offline
Woot! That's awesome Busboy, thanks! Wow, he played Sammael too, very, very cool Man, I never saw that werecreature in Blade - maybe it was the third one... or the series?
Love this piccie of William: http://web.mac.com/creatureboy/iWeb/Sit … 5Z2363.jpg
Love those feet!!
Offline
The Busboy wrote:
Here's the website of the person who played "William" in that movie: www.creatureboy.com
Sweet! The middle pic of William makes a great desktop wallpaper.
Offline
Wow. What a resume.
Offline
I liked the movie "The Relic" too, and he played that creature too!
Offline
I don't know what it is about this series, but it's doing absolutely nothing for me.
But William was a good looking Werewolf - if only he had some fur.
Maybe I'm just not Gothic enough.......
Offline
WolfVanZandt wrote:
I don't know what it is about this series, but it's doing absolutely nothing for me.
*agree*
WolfVanZandt wrote:
But William was a good looking Werewolf - if only he had some fur.
But, he had more fur than any of the other werewolves in the series combined!
Offline
Aye.
I've figured it out, though. There are so many twists in the story without and building up to them, that it looks like the producers have no idea where they want the story to go.
In good suspense stories (Hitchcock, Samalayan, etc.) You have one big twist and plenty of foreshadowing leading up to it. This story just seems to ramble aimlessly.
And the Werewolves are ugly.......Wiliam a little better than the others but still uuuuuuuuuuuugly
Offline
And another thing, these people need badly to take a basic course in physics. If you have a werewolf at point A connected by a chain to a Werewolf at point B,Werewolf A can pull Werewolf B toward him but he cannot, under any circumstances, without moving from point A, swing Werewolf B in a circular arc through a circuit of 180°. It can't happen.
But I'd like to have a set of those Werewolf feet...... they look fun.
Offline
WolfVanZandt wrote:
But I'd like to have a set of those Werewolf feet...... they look fun.
Same here, WolfVanZandt!
Offline
Again, if you take a helicopter at point A 40 feet above the ground and drop a 65 foot cable down into a 25 foot hold, then give the end of the cable to a vampire at point B 65 feet below said helicopter. Then you let the (say, 250 pound) vampire tug on the cable, the vampire will, necessarily, be relocated some short distance off the ground. The helicopter will move some very small distance toward point B. But under no circumstances will the vampire at point B be able to drag the helicopter from point A to point B.
Offline
But! *brushes out some chalk marks* IF the vampire at point B *stabs chalk on the B* were to use his invisible vampire mojo *circles B and draws lots of wavy lines* when pulling on the said cable *draws arrows* he would *makes quote hand sign* attract *another annoying quote sign* the helicopter to him by sheer mojo force *more wavy lines, more arrows, and a little bubble with 'Haaaalp' drawn coming out of the helicopter*.
And don't forget, for some unknown reason (going with same said 'vampire mojo' theory here) the helicopter somehow landed on it's side, cutting through a rope bridge, and then was somehow suspended with blades STILL rotating, while somehow keeping the rope bridge from falling? Hello? Could someone update me with Physics 2.0??
Offline
O.O
Okay (scribbling away with chalk) If said mojo was used, the helecopter would have been (irritating hand quote signs)sucked(more of the same) straight down in the hole instead of turned up - like this (redraws helecopter folded translaterally across the middle) and it uld have sat at an obtuse angle across the bridge sorta like a hot cross bun on a cooling rack.......
Offline
Needless to say, that helicopter, and the bridge would have been toast! Damn that movie was ridiculous!!
And and and - what the heck was up at the end when she got stabbed through, then exposed to sunlight but was a-okie-dokie?? Strummer and I were like 'alrighty, they're cured' then they started rambling off again about this just being the start, and who knew what the future would hold with them being what they were...
*goes off on an intense half hour boggling session*
Offline
They needed a nice sunride on the hill scene......
"I sway-yah Micah-l, ahl nevah go hungry a-gay-yahn" (I'm a Southerner, so I an do that.)
"Frankly mah dee-yah, Sayleen, I don't givah dam."
(No, wait. I think that's been done.)
Offline
Offline
Is that Tara burning in the background?
*Cues "Gone with the Wind" theme song.
Offline
(Sniff, sniff) Toastiesssssssss
Offline
ah, the underworld trilogy.
possibly the greatest movies of all time.
especially the third, which just recently came out in theatres.
and so many wolves!
as the series moves on, the werewolves become more and more like the stereotypical wolves we find in our imaginations. thus making them better, right?
i disagree.
whiloe in the third movie, they look exceptionally amazing, i prefer the more ragged look of those in the first movie. they are less like what we imagine.
another thing that has to be said about that, though, is that the scruffy look befits the werewolves in that movie because if you look at them in human form, they are all ragged anyway.
but still, these movies are amazing.
Offline
Well, when I read Evolution the first time and realized that according to that Selene was already some 200 years old when Victor let her family be killed I started to wonder about that claim that it had been planned as trilogy from the start, but hey George Lucas probably rewrote the meaning of *planned trilogy* irrevocable.
I guess with Underworld you have to take the same aproach as with Ginger Snaps, take every movie solely on its own.
Last edited by Daninsky (2009-03-10 12:06:27)
Offline